Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:08

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Russia can stop this any time.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Have you ever lost any respect for someone instantly?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Let’s just make it real clear:

Just in the last 5 years:

5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

How does ChatGPT compare to Claude AI?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Thank you.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Eum ipsa id ullam qui.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Geologists Just Cracked Open a 500-Million-Year Mystery in the Grand Canyon — What They Found Is Rewriting Earth’s History - Indian Defence Review

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Winners & Losers From The 2025 NCAA Baseball Tournament Regional Round - Baseball America

What’s next?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Marathon isn’t going to be another Concord, Sony insists - polygon.com

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

New Pluto-Like Planet Discovered In Solar System — What To Know - Forbes

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

How do you raise well-behaved children?